A2B2

Full Version: Smucker Gnarlsen: Based or Nah?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Please tell, do tell, hombres.
Tucker Carlson is completely biased towards the Republican party. The way he frames the news is laughably dishonest: he cries outrage over BLM and antifa while he tries to downplay the severity of the Capitol attack. So nah, not based.
(05-24-2021, 11:09 AM)d33p Wrote: [ -> ]Tucker Carlson is completely biased towards the Republican party. The way he frames the news is laughably dishonest: he cries outrage over BLM and antifa while he tries to downplay the severity of the Capitol attack. So nah, not based.

smucker gnarlsen is not based in retrospect.
when you actually get a seat on the gravy train, your perspective becomes very flexible

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMr3KtYUCcI&t=1s

the whole republican party has been a sham for over half a century: its really just a fact at this point.

tucker is a fat squirrel filling his face no matter how ugly he looks, "for my family" or for a fancy car of whatever makes the hookers give him a better hand job.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8R6StQfLNbw


these guys are nice

BAN ME ALREADY
FUCK YOU ALREADY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqwvNmG651Q&t=3s
I DO NOT THINK HIGHLY NOR WELL OF YOU

just saying

but youve made what youve made
one of the most punchable faces in television. im only just now learning hes republican because i couldnt focus on anything other than the tactile sensation of face on fist while watching him
I don't know a whole lot about Cucker Tarlson other than that he wants to fuck the green M&M and got pissed about the dick vein being removed from Snickers